<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thanks Darling: Good news for SMEs.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wilsondan.co.uk/2008/11/25/thanks-darling-good-news-for-smes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wilsondan.co.uk/2008/11/25/thanks-darling-good-news-for-smes/</link>
	<description>Digital consultant, eBay expert, writer &#38; blogger.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 18:48:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Wilson</title>
		<link>http://www.wilsondan.co.uk/2008/11/25/thanks-darling-good-news-for-smes/comment-page-1/#comment-40317</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 01:19:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wilsondan.co.uk/?p=421#comment-40317</guid>
		<description>Coops:

Didn&#039;t have you down as a &#039;do nothing&#039; type. ;o)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Coops:</p>
<p>Didn&#8217;t have you down as a &#8216;do nothing&#8217; type. ;o)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: james coops</title>
		<link>http://www.wilsondan.co.uk/2008/11/25/thanks-darling-good-news-for-smes/comment-page-1/#comment-40305</link>
		<dc:creator>james coops</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 00:57:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wilsondan.co.uk/?p=421#comment-40305</guid>
		<description>Come off it Dan - we&#039;d be in a much better position to offer a real stimulus package if the public finances weren&#039;t in such a mess after the last 10 years of over-spending on government.  

Small business will not be helped in the long-run by operating in a low growth economy where we are all paying off debt rather than using the money for something worthwhile like investing in education.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Come off it Dan &#8211; we&#8217;d be in a much better position to offer a real stimulus package if the public finances weren&#8217;t in such a mess after the last 10 years of over-spending on government.  </p>
<p>Small business will not be helped in the long-run by operating in a low growth economy where we are all paying off debt rather than using the money for something worthwhile like investing in education.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lynne</title>
		<link>http://www.wilsondan.co.uk/2008/11/25/thanks-darling-good-news-for-smes/comment-page-1/#comment-40280</link>
		<dc:creator>Lynne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 18:54:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wilsondan.co.uk/?p=421#comment-40280</guid>
		<description>I would have liked to have seen the threshold at which companies have to register for VAT raised, my personal belief is that this is too low.  If your turnover is only at the VAT threshold level of Â£67,000, the likelihood is that you are not making sufficient profit to pay for any additional staffing as well as yourself, and you are therefore doing all your own administration.  Even if you are paying an accountant, you still have to prepare the information for him to calculate the VAT.

Under the current circumstances, to take the turnover threshold up to Â£100,000 would have taken a large number of the smallest companies out of the loop, costing the Government comparably little, and saving the companies a great deal of administration time - this time saving would have been extremely valuable to a microcompany;  as much if not more valuable than the money involved.  

My MP raised a question for me with the DTI, but was told that the UK threshold is plenty high enough, higher than most of Europe, and so there was not likely to be any adjustment in the near future.  Shame that they didn&#039;t take this opportunity to change their opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would have liked to have seen the threshold at which companies have to register for VAT raised, my personal belief is that this is too low.  If your turnover is only at the VAT threshold level of Â£67,000, the likelihood is that you are not making sufficient profit to pay for any additional staffing as well as yourself, and you are therefore doing all your own administration.  Even if you are paying an accountant, you still have to prepare the information for him to calculate the VAT.</p>
<p>Under the current circumstances, to take the turnover threshold up to Â£100,000 would have taken a large number of the smallest companies out of the loop, costing the Government comparably little, and saving the companies a great deal of administration time &#8211; this time saving would have been extremely valuable to a microcompany;  as much if not more valuable than the money involved.  </p>
<p>My MP raised a question for me with the DTI, but was told that the UK threshold is plenty high enough, higher than most of Europe, and so there was not likely to be any adjustment in the near future.  Shame that they didn&#8217;t take this opportunity to change their opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Wilson</title>
		<link>http://www.wilsondan.co.uk/2008/11/25/thanks-darling-good-news-for-smes/comment-page-1/#comment-40278</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 13:05:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wilsondan.co.uk/?p=421#comment-40278</guid>
		<description>Lynne,

Thanks for that.

I&#039;m rather of the opinion that the fact there will be an additional Â£12bn rattling around the economy is good enough.

http://www.smallbizpod.co.uk/news/2008/pre-budget-report-2008-small-business-impact/

Alex makes some interesting and valid points, not least re the 2 million or so non-Vat regged bizzes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lynne,</p>
<p>Thanks for that.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m rather of the opinion that the fact there will be an additional Â£12bn rattling around the economy is good enough.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.smallbizpod.co.uk/news/2008/pre-budget-report-2008-small-business-impact/" rel="nofollow">http://www.smallbizpod.co.uk/news/2008/pre-budget-report-2008-small-business-impact/</a></p>
<p>Alex makes some interesting and valid points, not least re the 2 million or so non-Vat regged bizzes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lynne</title>
		<link>http://www.wilsondan.co.uk/2008/11/25/thanks-darling-good-news-for-smes/comment-page-1/#comment-40277</link>
		<dc:creator>Lynne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 12:54:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wilsondan.co.uk/?p=421#comment-40277</guid>
		<description>For us, the reduction in VAT is an enormous plus. We sell second hand and antique items, so run a VAT Margin scheme.  

In essence, this means that, although we can&#039;t charge any VAT on our items, as second hand goods are not VATable, the VAT man considers it reasonable to charge us VAT on our gross profit, i.e. the difference between what we get in, and what we pay for the goods.  No, we can&#039;t deduct any expenses made in getting the profit, just the difference between the two.  So this means that I pay an additional 17.5% tax on my gross profits, regardless of whether I make a taxable net profit or not.  

As a micro business, this has always been a real thorn in my side.  So for the next year, I will have a 2.5% bonus that I can pay to myself instead of the government!  Yay!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For us, the reduction in VAT is an enormous plus. We sell second hand and antique items, so run a VAT Margin scheme.  </p>
<p>In essence, this means that, although we can&#8217;t charge any VAT on our items, as second hand goods are not VATable, the VAT man considers it reasonable to charge us VAT on our gross profit, i.e. the difference between what we get in, and what we pay for the goods.  No, we can&#8217;t deduct any expenses made in getting the profit, just the difference between the two.  So this means that I pay an additional 17.5% tax on my gross profits, regardless of whether I make a taxable net profit or not.  </p>
<p>As a micro business, this has always been a real thorn in my side.  So for the next year, I will have a 2.5% bonus that I can pay to myself instead of the government!  Yay!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

