Eton: David Cameron and dirty words

etoncrestWhen Alec Douglas-Home died in 1995, I remember asking one of my teachers whether he thought there would ever again be a Prime Minister who’d been schooled at Eton.

I paraphrase his reply, but it was unequivocal, slightly venomous and laced with regret. “Never again. John Major and his “classless society” nonsense has seen to that.”

It was exactly the notion of a classless society that meant it could happen again, I argued back. After all, Tony Blair (Labour leader at the time) was a public schoolboy, class politics was on the wane and that meant an Old Etonian (OE) could be Prime Minister. Mischievously, I added that an OE PM need not necessarily be Conservative.

I do remember his withering look and the finality of his response keenly. “Normal public schoolboys perhaps. But not Etonians. Eton is a dirty word. A four letter word. Home was the last.”

It’s probably worth noting that when I had this discussion I was an Eton schoolboy replete with black tailcoat and starched collar. I was (as I indeed remain) a fully paid up member of the Labour party and in a subsequent post I might talk about how a this state comprehensive schoolboy from Brighton ended up at Eton if anyone is particularly interested.

I tittered at Gordon Brown’s recent comment at during Prime Minister’s Question time that David Cameron’s tax policy had been dreamt up “on the playing fields of Eton.” It was funny enough. I wasn’t particularly impressed by Cameron’s response that called it “spiteful”. It was certainly less spiteful a jibe than Tory quips calling former Speaker Martin “Gorbals Mick”. Brown also has the merit of being accurate. Cameron went to Eton. Lord Martin isn’t from the Gorbals.

But what’s surprising is how much coverage Brown’s Eton line generated. For over a week, and even today, it’s still driving comment in the press. A certain rough and tumble is an acceptable aspect of politics. In some senses it’s part of the fun. For Cameron to criticise what he has called “Punch and Judy politics” is like a sewer objecting to shit.

It might be fun, but we don’t learn a lot from it. It was little more than Gordon Brown legitimately pointing out that Tory plans do indeed benefit the rich over the poor. It was also apt in a week when millionaire Old Etonian Zac Goldsmith was criticised for evading tax as a non-dom whilst also seeking election to Parliament.

Equally, the public school jibe doesn’t stand up to much scrutiny. There are plenty of good Labour comrades who went to public school (Attlee, Tony Benn, Blair) and plenty of Tories who didn’t. Not a few Labour figures were OEs, including notably the very great and dogged Tam Dalyell. Attlee’s first Chancellor of the Exchequer in those great reforming Labour governments of 1945-51, Hugh Dalton, went to Eton. (The other two, Cripps and Gaitskell, went to Winchester.)

But I think the Eton jibe was invoking more than just public schools and speaks to the peculiar place Eton holds in the public imagination. As my old beak said (that’s what they call teachers at Eton), it’s a dirty word. It invokes something visceral and reviled. It’s almost a synonym for the ruling class, privilege and aristocracy. It’s not for nothing that the old joke says that Eton should have a sign above the door: “Cabinetmakers to Her Majesty the Queen.” The Queen has worked with 11 PMs. 3 have been old Etonians. 18 in total since Walpole had the school motta ‘Floreat Etona’.

And that’s why Brown’s comment was powerful and potentially effective. It doesn’t do anything for talking up Labour’s achievements but it does raise questions. Can an Old Etonian with substantial personal wealth like David Cameron understand ordinary folk? And it also encourages scrutiny of the extraordinary number of OEs in the Tory ranks.

In this age of post-aristocratic politics, that there are more Old Etonians than women in the Tory top team does deserve greater examination. There are 15 OE MPs. 13 Conservatives. Labour and LibDems have one apiece. They represent something like 7% of all Member of Parliament. (Incidentally, in the House of Lords there are more than 80 OEs.) It’s not difficult to say that it’s too many and that representation on the Tory frontbench is disproportionate.

But what’s the cause? Is it favouritism, a Nietzschean will to power, elitism, misplaced deference, connections, some sort of conspiracy or what? In any case, it’s bizarre and possibly worrying. In my next post, I‘ll write about how I think the nature of Eton as a meritocracy and aspirational environment, its ethos and schooling influences students and encourages its former pupils to go into politics.

(This is the first of several posts where I’ll discuss Eton, politics and my experience there. If there’s anything you might want me to cover, do leave a comment and I’ll see if I can squeeze it in. Subsequent posts haven’t been written yet.)

6 Responses to Eton: David Cameron and dirty words

  1. Sue says:

    I’m always tempted to go “oh ffs, it’s only a school” – but
    that there are more Old Etonians than women in the Tory top team does deserve greater examination.
    that makes me think I’m probably wrong about that.

  2. Lynne says:

    “I might talk about how a this state comprehensive schoolboy from Brighton ended up at Eton if anyone is particularly interested.”

    Well, I’m interested…please?

  3. Christi says:

    The question is not ‘Can somebody who attended Eton understand the poor’. Eton is a public school, and that’s all that it is. Most of the current Labour cabinet attended public school. Even those who didn’t are wealthy now, having earned a fortune off taxpayer money.

    Can THEY understand the poor?

    The recent expenses scandal, and the way MPs handled it with a combination of outrage and bewilderment, indicates that, no, they can’t understand the poor. And, frankly, they can’t understand the middle class. They have absolutely no idea what it’s like to rent a flat in London or Manchester, to struggle to pay their bills, to take public transportation home whenever you are finally going home.

    Can these wealthy men begin to imagine what it’s like to be a woman who gets off work at 8pm on a Friday night and struggles home on a filthy, dangerous tube filled with drunken yobs?

    They don’t know what our problems are, not really. They are given reports on them, but they do not FEEL these problems. They do not understand this country in which the average family income is £27,000 per year. They have no idea whatsoever what it’s like to live on that kind of income, and they probably can’t imagine trying to do it.

    How is this democracy? How are these people, selected off of lists that they prepare and offer us, representative?

    Eton is a red herring. And the class war is a lie. Public school boys telling us that OTHER public school boys don’t understand us is absurd.

    We’re not that stupid.

    But we are being cheated.

    And the question is: What do we do about it?

  4. Sue says:

    As well as what Lynne said, what I’m really interested in is whether Eton is a cause or a symptom. Is it that the kind of people who have children who go on to be Prime Ministers send their children to Eton, or is it something that Eton specifically does? If Eton were closed down, would we suddenly start seeing similar figures to the ones above for Harrow or Westminster or whatever, or would there be a much greater variety of schools involved all of a sudden?

    Same question for Oxford, I guess.

    Because if it’s something that Eton’s doing, I would suggest that rather than condemning it, emulating it might be the way to go.

  5. dw says:

    This post was originally written under aa Labour Govt.

    The Queen has now had 12 Prime Ministers and one third have been Old Etonians would now be the accurate statement.

  6. Pingback: Douglas Hurd backs Ed Miliband* | Dan Wilson | eBay Expert, Online Community Specialist, Author and Blogger

Leave a Reply

Please use your real name instead of your company name or keyword spam.