<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Where&#8217;s Ben Duncan&#8217;s blog gone?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wilsondan.co.uk/2010/02/04/wheres-ben-duncans-blog-gone/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wilsondan.co.uk/2010/02/04/wheres-ben-duncans-blog-gone/</link>
	<description>eBay Expert, Online Community Specialist, Author and Blogger</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 07:46:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: punkscience</title>
		<link>http://www.wilsondan.co.uk/2010/02/04/wheres-ben-duncans-blog-gone/comment-page-1/#comment-41689</link>
		<dc:creator>punkscience</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 23:55:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wilsondan.co.uk/?p=1637#comment-41689</guid>
		<description>Good on you Ben for responding unequivocally. I wish you the best of luck in your campaign.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good on you Ben for responding unequivocally. I wish you the best of luck in your campaign.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Finn</title>
		<link>http://www.wilsondan.co.uk/2010/02/04/wheres-ben-duncans-blog-gone/comment-page-1/#comment-41688</link>
		<dc:creator>Finn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 15:42:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wilsondan.co.uk/?p=1637#comment-41688</guid>
		<description>hmmm, sure it&#039;s disappearance isn’t something to do with this http://liberalengland.blogspot.com/search?q=ben+duncan 
The Green Party is paranoid about divisions and flaky candidates, and consequently trying to silence and secretly remove PPCs who have eccentric or alternative views. http://209.85.229.132/search?q=cache:BBxQuAme1oEJ:sarahgoldsmith.wordpress.com/+sarahgoldsmith+wordpress&amp;cd=6&amp;hl=en&amp;ct=clnk&amp;gl=uk
It’s not just Ben’s Blog that has disappeared; any reference to the Green Party’s Torbay/South Devon PPC has disappeared after she was featured in the press as a witch http://punkscientist.blogspot.com/2010/01/green-party-parliamentary-candidate-for.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hmmm, sure it&#8217;s disappearance isn’t something to do with this <a href="http://liberalengland.blogspot.com/search?q=ben+duncan" rel="nofollow">http://liberalengland.blogspot.com/search?q=ben+duncan</a><br />
The Green Party is paranoid about divisions and flaky candidates, and consequently trying to silence and secretly remove PPCs who have eccentric or alternative views. <a href="http://209.85.229.132/search?q=cache:BBxQuAme1oEJ:sarahgoldsmith.wordpress.com/+sarahgoldsmith+wordpress&amp;cd=6&amp;hl=en&amp;ct=clnk&amp;gl=uk" rel="nofollow">http://209.85.229.132/search?q=cache:BBxQuAme1oEJ:sarahgoldsmith.wordpress.com/+sarahgoldsmith+wordpress&amp;cd=6&amp;hl=en&amp;ct=clnk&amp;gl=uk</a><br />
It’s not just Ben’s Blog that has disappeared; any reference to the Green Party’s Torbay/South Devon PPC has disappeared after she was featured in the press as a witch <a href="http://punkscientist.blogspot.com/2010/01/green-party-parliamentary-candidate-for.html" rel="nofollow">http://punkscientist.blogspot.com/2010/01/green-party-parliamentary-candidate-for.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dw</title>
		<link>http://www.wilsondan.co.uk/2010/02/04/wheres-ben-duncans-blog-gone/comment-page-1/#comment-41687</link>
		<dc:creator>dw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 13:26:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wilsondan.co.uk/?p=1637#comment-41687</guid>
		<description>Ben,

Glad to hear you haven&#039;t been axed!

I must also apologise: your comment has languished overnight in my blog&#039;s comment spam filter. Otherwise I would, of course, have published your very full and open respose sooner. 

I knew you wouldn&#039;t disappoint. As several folk said to me yesterday: you would have been a loss to Brighton political blogland. Thank goodness you&#039;re not going anywhere. 

Cheers,

dw</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ben,</p>
<p>Glad to hear you haven&#8217;t been axed!</p>
<p>I must also apologise: your comment has languished overnight in my blog&#8217;s comment spam filter. Otherwise I would, of course, have published your very full and open respose sooner. </p>
<p>I knew you wouldn&#8217;t disappoint. As several folk said to me yesterday: you would have been a loss to Brighton political blogland. Thank goodness you&#8217;re not going anywhere. </p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>dw</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Disappearance of Kemptown Ben&#8217;s blog sparks speculation &#171; Brighton and Hove News</title>
		<link>http://www.wilsondan.co.uk/2010/02/04/wheres-ben-duncans-blog-gone/comment-page-1/#comment-41686</link>
		<dc:creator>Disappearance of Kemptown Ben&#8217;s blog sparks speculation &#171; Brighton and Hove News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 10:07:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wilsondan.co.uk/?p=1637#comment-41686</guid>
		<description>[...] has prompted Labour blogger Dan Wilson to ask him a series of questions, including: &#8220;When your blog returns, will you be in charge as before or will you have to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] has prompted Labour blogger Dan Wilson to ask him a series of questions, including: &#8220;When your blog returns, will you be in charge as before or will you have to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Duncan</title>
		<link>http://www.wilsondan.co.uk/2010/02/04/wheres-ben-duncans-blog-gone/comment-page-1/#comment-41684</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Duncan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 16:42:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wilsondan.co.uk/?p=1637#comment-41684</guid>
		<description>Hi Dan

Thanks for your kind words about my contributions to the blogosphere - rest assured, my decision to stop publishing it won&#039;t mean I&#039;m absent from blogland for long. I&#039;m looking forward to posting to www.benduncan.org as soon as the site&#039;s up and ready.

In response to your specific questions:

- When will your blog/website be back?


Soon - in the next week or so, I hope, although it won&#039;t be quite the same, of course. The new site will be much more electorally focused: it will be a candidate website, and will be much more centred on talking about polcy and campaigning issues, as seems appropriate for a candidate in a General Election! The aim is to have it all up and running by the time Gord-help-us Gordon fires the starting gun on the election. I&#039;ll let you know when it&#039;s live.


- Are you moving your blog to a new platform?


Yes. I feel it&#039;s inappropriate, in an election period, for me to use a comms platform provided by Google. It would be a campaign donation, in kind at least - hence the move to a locally published site and blogging platform run entirely by the local Green Party, and using Open Source Software.


- Was your blog&#039;s deletion required or suggested by the Green Party or Caroline Lucas? (Let&#039;s face it, you love being controversial!)


No!



- When it returns, as you&#039;ve promised on Twitter, will your blog have all the previous content as before?


My blog posts are daily commentaries - they necessarily become historical once a new one is published! There are no plans for me to carry an archive of my historical mutterings on www.benduncan.org - after all they were written for a different site, with different objectives - but if you or any of your readers are really interested they are all at http://bensarchivedposts.blogspot.com


- When your blog returns, will you be in charge as before or will you have to clear posts with Green Party colleagues?


I&#039;ll be mostly in charge - though not entirely as it won&#039;t all be about me. Rather, www.benduncan.org will be a campaigning website with details of the activities and policies of the Green Party locally and nationally, as I think is entirely appropriate for a website promoting a General Election candidate standing on a party platform.

It&#039;ll have a broader scope than just my musings - though they&#039;ll be there and I&#039;ll be responsible for producing and publishing them. There&#039;s a legal aspect to all this too:  electoral law means, in a sense, my election agent will be responsible for everything on the site too. There will therefore have to be a system in place for making sure all the right buttons of transparency and accountability are ticked and that the site doesn&#039;t say or do anything which could breach electoral law.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dan</p>
<p>Thanks for your kind words about my contributions to the blogosphere &#8211; rest assured, my decision to stop publishing it won&#8217;t mean I&#8217;m absent from blogland for long. I&#8217;m looking forward to posting to <a href="http://www.benduncan.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.benduncan.org</a> as soon as the site&#8217;s up and ready.</p>
<p>In response to your specific questions:</p>
<p>- When will your blog/website be back?</p>
<p>Soon &#8211; in the next week or so, I hope, although it won&#8217;t be quite the same, of course. The new site will be much more electorally focused: it will be a candidate website, and will be much more centred on talking about polcy and campaigning issues, as seems appropriate for a candidate in a General Election! The aim is to have it all up and running by the time Gord-help-us Gordon fires the starting gun on the election. I&#8217;ll let you know when it&#8217;s live.</p>
<p>- Are you moving your blog to a new platform?</p>
<p>Yes. I feel it&#8217;s inappropriate, in an election period, for me to use a comms platform provided by Google. It would be a campaign donation, in kind at least &#8211; hence the move to a locally published site and blogging platform run entirely by the local Green Party, and using Open Source Software.</p>
<p>- Was your blog&#8217;s deletion required or suggested by the Green Party or Caroline Lucas? (Let&#8217;s face it, you love being controversial!)</p>
<p>No!</p>
<p>- When it returns, as you&#8217;ve promised on Twitter, will your blog have all the previous content as before?</p>
<p>My blog posts are daily commentaries &#8211; they necessarily become historical once a new one is published! There are no plans for me to carry an archive of my historical mutterings on <a href="http://www.benduncan.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.benduncan.org</a> &#8211; after all they were written for a different site, with different objectives &#8211; but if you or any of your readers are really interested they are all at <a href="http://bensarchivedposts.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://bensarchivedposts.blogspot.com</a></p>
<p>- When your blog returns, will you be in charge as before or will you have to clear posts with Green Party colleagues?</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll be mostly in charge &#8211; though not entirely as it won&#8217;t all be about me. Rather, <a href="http://www.benduncan.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.benduncan.org</a> will be a campaigning website with details of the activities and policies of the Green Party locally and nationally, as I think is entirely appropriate for a website promoting a General Election candidate standing on a party platform.</p>
<p>It&#8217;ll have a broader scope than just my musings &#8211; though they&#8217;ll be there and I&#8217;ll be responsible for producing and publishing them. There&#8217;s a legal aspect to all this too:  electoral law means, in a sense, my election agent will be responsible for everything on the site too. There will therefore have to be a system in place for making sure all the right buttons of transparency and accountability are ticked and that the site doesn&#8217;t say or do anything which could breach electoral law.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
